tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2867241161905183044.post5433628330584822620..comments2008-11-10T21:49:50.395-05:00David Weinerhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11679660914458968542noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2867241161905183044.post-58455268512174102102008-11-10T21:49:50.395-05:002008-11-10T21:49:50.395-05:00It's been a pretty rapid transition but one that is very impactful. Thanks for the comment!<BR/><BR/>DWDavid Weinerhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11679660914458968542noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2867241161905183044.post-84897514328611660632008-11-10T18:16:03.190-05:002008-11-10T18:16:03.190-05:00I agree. When news breaks or is breaking, Twitter is far better/faster than blogging. <BR/><BR/>On this Election night, I pretty much lived on Twitter (to get and give information watching TV I can't get in Denmark) and Facebook (for commentary). You and I twitted a few times, as I remember.<BR/><BR/>Four years ago, however, I thought I would live blog -- quickly gave up the idea. But I also tried to follow blogs -- and gave that up, too. CNN outran bloggers (I wrote about it here: http://allanjenkins.typepad.com/my_weblog/2004/11/bloggers_fail_t.html<BR/><BR/>This year I didn't even look into the bloggers. Not sure I even thought to.Desirable Roasted Coffeehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04227321711452861518noreply@blogger.com